Ktm
Well, it's hard for me to recommend the KTM without knowing the Husky and my recent misfortune with the KTM 300xcw. I was originally going to buy a 525sx before the deal fell through. I'm actually starting to think about the 07 KTM instead of the GG, even though I know GG has superior suspension components. With the KTM, you have the lack of shock linkage that is a very simple setup and eliminates linkage maintenance. I don't think anyone has ever decided if the lack of linkage helps or hurts handling.
I don't know either the Husky or four stroke KTM's, but I know how easy it is to work on an 300xc. The KTM xc is so easy to work on that I could do a top end job in about 30 minutes using the tiny tool kit and disassemble the rest of the bike as well(maybe not split the cases).
From what I have heard, the valve tappets on the KTM are easy to get to,adjust, and the valves have a long life. The Husky with the shim valve I have no idea the amount of work it would take to adjust, but my cousin has a Yamaha WR250 that has a shim valve motor, and right after he got it, we sat around, laughing our asses off reading the service manual and what it would take to adjust the valves. I may remember wrong, but I think the motor had to be removed, and we basically decided the bike would be sold, burned, or pushed off a cliff before that happened.
Don't listen to me. I just sold myself on what bike I'm going to buy. I think I want the KTM525sx. That's what I really wanted and settled for the 300xcw, and got ripped of. I have a fast two stroke with gobs of low end torque and and tons of top end and a brutal power band(CR500). I want a try a beastly four stroke.
Matt
Well, it's hard for me to recommend the KTM without knowing the Husky and my recent misfortune with the KTM 300xcw. I was originally going to buy a 525sx before the deal fell through. I'm actually starting to think about the 07 KTM instead of the GG, even though I know GG has superior suspension components. With the KTM, you have the lack of shock linkage that is a very simple setup and eliminates linkage maintenance. I don't think anyone has ever decided if the lack of linkage helps or hurts handling.
I don't know either the Husky or four stroke KTM's, but I know how easy it is to work on an 300xc. The KTM xc is so easy to work on that I could do a top end job in about 30 minutes using the tiny tool kit and disassemble the rest of the bike as well(maybe not split the cases).
From what I have heard, the valve tappets on the KTM are easy to get to,adjust, and the valves have a long life. The Husky with the shim valve I have no idea the amount of work it would take to adjust, but my cousin has a Yamaha WR250 that has a shim valve motor, and right after he got it, we sat around, laughing our asses off reading the service manual and what it would take to adjust the valves. I may remember wrong, but I think the motor had to be removed, and we basically decided the bike would be sold, burned, or pushed off a cliff before that happened.
Don't listen to me. I just sold myself on what bike I'm going to buy. I think I want the KTM525sx. That's what I really wanted and settled for the 300xcw, and got ripped of. I have a fast two stroke with gobs of low end torque and and tons of top end and a brutal power band(CR500). I want a try a beastly four stroke.
Matt