roverhybrids
Member
Disclaimer: I don't know jack about suspension.
I'm a mechanical person and tend to do research online to get an understanding of something and then dive into it not actually understanding it until I've done it.(mainly this has to do with the nature of the internet and how many people like to talk about things they ready don't know or understand either)
So now we come to suspension. I don't totally understand revalving or respringing suspension; but I seem to be going with the "theory" that there are maybe 3 different spring rates(in progressive order) that would work for a given rider.(like 5.0, 5.2, 5.4 for the rear of a GG for a 160# rider) The weight of the rider is one factor and then the riding style and terrain are the main others.
So this theory I can basically understand. What I don't understand is why or how some tuners want to use much softer springs.
for instance 4.8 rear spring for 200#+ rider
or 4.0 front springs for 180# rider
I'm a mechanical person and tend to do research online to get an understanding of something and then dive into it not actually understanding it until I've done it.(mainly this has to do with the nature of the internet and how many people like to talk about things they ready don't know or understand either)
So now we come to suspension. I don't totally understand revalving or respringing suspension; but I seem to be going with the "theory" that there are maybe 3 different spring rates(in progressive order) that would work for a given rider.(like 5.0, 5.2, 5.4 for the rear of a GG for a 160# rider) The weight of the rider is one factor and then the riding style and terrain are the main others.
So this theory I can basically understand. What I don't understand is why or how some tuners want to use much softer springs.
for instance 4.8 rear spring for 200#+ rider
or 4.0 front springs for 180# rider