Jakobi
Super Moderator
300 !!!:d:d
Well blingin! Be better if it was a 250
300 !!!:d:d
I'm a240 pound a vet racer and have ridden and raced recent model gasser 250's and 300's. Every time I'm racing the 250 I keep telling myself I need more power but at the end of the day I always have better race results aboard the 250 than the 300. I am convinced that for my type of enduro racing in northern california the 250 is the best.
If I was down in southern California or anywhere with consistent 3rd gear and up riding the 300 might be better, but I think the 250 will still hit quicker and get up on top of sand easier and it feels at least 10 pounds lighter even though they weigh the same.
What about trail riding in gnarly 1st/2nd gear technical conditions predomidantly off idle and well below the powerband?
I run with a 50 tooth rear and core exp and it was adequate in that stuff, if I had a steady diet of 1 and 2nd gear stuff I would probably just go up one or two on the sprocket.
Interesting how the ktm comes with a fast engine and suspension more suited to ST and the GG comes with a chugging engine and stock suspension suited to flat out racing!I understand your issues. My 05 EC250 is quite torquey with the RB mods and with the 52T rear end, the clutch is usually an afterthought.
The Gas Gas 300 is not at all like a KTM 300. The Gasser is quite spirited. Sort of like a big 250. The KTM300 has changed it's tune over the last few years. It used to be a low-end chugger but it seems to be more revvy now, but not as spirited as the Gasser.
I'm going with the 300.
I run with a 50 tooth rear and core exp and it was adequate in that stuff, if I had a steady diet of 1 and 2nd gear stuff I would probably just go up one or two on the sprocket.
Don't see too much on the 200. Why? Is it as good or better than the orange one? Doing my homework ahead as the dealers in NY are at both ends of the state and I'm in the middle. Currently on a ooolder KTM 300 exc.