2018 EC250 squish, jetting & pistons

Gibnut

New member
Posted this on DBW (I?m Or-strayan, moite)

I rode the bike after Dave at Two Stroke Performance, Victoria, (twostrokeperformance.com.au) re-cut my head - power was noticeably up down low & spooge was greatly reduced. The bike was, however, running on a little.

Jetting - NEDW #3, 45p/175m, a/s 1.5.

Squish - was 2.31mm, now 1.35mm. With squish like that, no wonder she?s a spooge-machine!

Note to all ?18 EC250 owners - before you get your head sorted (use TSP, Dave & Jason are awesome) you will need to accurately measure your piston crown height by taking the barrel off the bike, or find a way to measure piston outside edge to piston crown while the barrel is in situ.

Why? There are confirmed reports of 2 different pistons in the marketplace, one with a crown height of 3.77mm & one with a crown height of @ 4.5mm. This obviously greatly affects compression & therefore (combined with an accurate squish reading) your tuner?s ability to set compression as per order.

I incorrectly assumed, as the bike hadn?t been apart, I had the lower crown piston - as another rider had the smaller piston installed from new.

This consequently gave Dave no chance of setting a reasonable compression ratio as he was going on an incorrect assumption. Stock is around 13.6/1 but with the incorrect crown height factored in, it was actually closer to mid-high 14?s; too high for my jetting. And, too high for my riding style, reasonable fuel consumption (was going to have to go 48p/180m ) & motor service life.

Currently waiting on a solution - either retrofit the smaller piston (preferred, as the head is set up for it) or have Dave re-shape (at no cost) to suit higher piston.

Option ?a? is preferable for obvious reasons.

I must say, this bike is so much fun to ride & easy to work on but has been an absolute shit to jet. Now we know why! My mates mostly ride GG300?s & no-one?s had these issues.

Also, there were a couple of ?Friday arvo build? niggles to be found when I pulled it down, too - pv arm lock nut, rhs cover, had backed out all the way down & while checking for air leaks, found the reed block bolts were not quite tight enough.

Hopefully, I am close to getting this fabulous motor to it?s potential. On the ride post-head cut, I was climbing rocky lines in 2nd that would usually need first. And that was with a lean condition!

It?s instructive that, being the pragmatic person I am, I have kept the faith (I?ve had moments when I wanted to ?fix? the bike with a hammer..) - because, as anyone who?s ridden an ?18 Gas Gas EC will happily tell you, the frame, suspension, handling, steering & balance are worth it!
 
Interesting, do they come with different crown heights from the factory? Isuppose you cant let a little thing like a supplier slown down the production line haha.

I am about to embark on the jetting crusade on my 300. I just got mine back after my teething problems too.

Did i read earlier that you had fitted a NGK BR8ES plug?

While my dealer was changing a dodgy set of head O rings they installed the same plug. I just noticed it while i was rerouting some cables and hoses.
 
Last edited:
Yep, I have already been in contact about it. However its only just on its second tank of fuel. Was thinking to get her properly run in before i send it off. I am blown away by the power it has now and i am pretty happy but i am not a 2 stroke tuning guru. I need to get someone involved who knows what they are doing with the tune. I am happy to do the spanner work, just need tuning help...
 
Lowering your squish clearance & reshaping the combustion bowl to keep your compression reasonable - which is what TSP will recommend for trail riding -, will improve fuel economy, reduce spooge caused by inefficient combustion, give you a boost low/mid & enable you to run lower octane fuel if you wish.

You cannot jet out these in-built inefficiencies - I know, I?ve tried!

However, if you?re happy with the power, economy, jetting & spooge just ride it.
 
Lowering your squish clearance & reshaping the combustion bowl to keep your compression reasonable - which is what TSP will recommend for trail riding -, will improve fuel economy, reduce spooge caused by inefficient combustion, give you a boost low/mid & enable you to run lower octane fuel if you wish.

You cannot jet out these in-built inefficiencies - I know, I?ve tried!

However, if you?re happy with the power, economy, jetting & spooge just ride it.


On the first tank i believe the dealer mixed it at 45:1 and i am not sure what oil they used. It was a spooge fest. I mixed up a frsh batch of 98 ultimate and Maxima K2 Synthetic at 50:1 and the spooge reduction was immediate. Its a fraction of what it was.

I have been following TSP for a while now and i like the look of what they do. I will most likely get the head done in the next couple of months.

Following your thread closely.
 
Now that RB-Designs (USA) no longer does Gas Gas (or Beta) head mods, we'll have to find a trustworthy machinist.

We generally have 91 octane here in Arizona, so maintaining compression ratio by opening up the combustion chamber is important.
 
Fieds, if your bike is a GP it has a different head to my EC. We would all love to see how it?s shaped by S3! My barrel has the S3 logo stamped on, too.

Rick D - Dave at Two Stroke Performance has said with appropriate jetting, there?s no reason why my bike won?t run well on 91 octane fuel. I am lucky enough to have good 98 around the corner from my house, though..
 
I have no fear of 91-Octane with a loose squish.

Just after a squish band mod (which would also require opening up of the combustion chamber).

I don't know who to go with on that, now.
 
Last edited:
Having the squish tight will help reduce detonation through better cooling of the piston crown. But you have to reduce the compression down to sensible levels. That will naturally cut into the squish area a bit and bring msv about right.

Clearly the piston crown should be parallel to the head. Wedged shape is not a tool required with a reasonable engine on OK fuel. And never a wedge closing in to the center.
 
and comparing fuels between straya and usa you have to remember we use RON as our standards and they use MON.
 
And farrenheight instead of sellyoususs for temperature although we should really be using kelvinklein degrees
 
Fieds, if your bike is a GP it has a different head to my EC. We would all love to see how it?s shaped by S3! My barrel has the S3 logo stamped on, too.

Rick D - Dave at Two Stroke Performance has said with appropriate jetting, there?s no reason why my bike won?t run well on 91 octane fuel. I am lucky enough to have good 98 around the corner from my house, though..

Mine is an EC mate, i would like a GP but the deal i got on the EC was too good to pass up.
 
A response to my email:

HI Rick

Thanks for the email

Yes, we offer that service where you send in your head and we either re-chamber it or machine it to accept our billet insert


We also have the billet head available now for the 2018 and newer 250 and 300..

Feel free to call anytime

Kelsey
208 852 3221
RK Tek Inc
 
Email #2

We completely re-configure the chamber.. We have done ALOT of testing with the Gas Gas and have got a chamber design that is woring very well. Compression ratios vary with elevation and octane.. We do NOT just have 1 chamber for everybody.. not the way we roll.. everyone is custom tailored for the application


Cost to rechamber i $150

Billet head is $325 and we only have a few in stock.
 
My bike is now fixed. I had the head cut by TSP (Australia) to lower squish to 1.35mm. I also had a closed-throttle lean condition caused by the slide being too high. This was throwing up red herrings regarding jetting & compression.

Running perfect.
 
Back
Top