Hi Guys,
the first thing I do when evaluating my options for an helmet is to check the Snell certification (
http://www.smf.org/. If it meets this criteria I then move along to all the other items I consider important for my standards.
The way I see it, and having tried a couple of helmets along the way, weight is not a decisive factor on my choice , I tend to build the notion that very low weight helmets are missing something...I know this might be considered controversial but I had quite a few examples that more or less lead me to this conclusion. Back in my youth days,
, when riding 50cc Yamaha I had 2 helmets, both from Nolan, one a full face and another (later) a replica of Edi Orioli's Dakar race helmet. Edi's was much heavier than the full face and the difference in absorbing the hits was astonishing at the time. For sure this was due to materials used on the outer and inside shell, much different from the plastic used on the full face.
I now ride with a FOX V3 and the weight difference to Edi's Nolan is not that significant but the constructions and materials used is light years ahead.
Comparing my V3 to an Airoh in terms of weight reminds me of the 2 Nolans I had in the past, I don't mean to bash Airoh but just the other day I was reading on a KTM forum in Portugal that someone's Airoh fell of the bike and simply cracked...
. Like I said, I don't mean to bash Airoh or any other helmet low weight helmet but I feel they are missing something...
Arai in my perspective are top of the line simply because there's no difference between the helmet you buy at the store and the one pro riders use in races, except for the collors. This says it all.
my 2 cents