MattR
Super Moderator
I'm looking to get a new bike next year. I really enjoyed my 2007 EC250, but just looking for a change. I have the desire to go back to a smaller engine size (200cc or less).
As you might recall, I had a 2004 KTM 200EXC in between owning my two GasGas 250's. I feel that I'm a faster rider on the 200. Smaller bikes make you stay focused more, busy with the gear box, and carry your speed through corners. Plus, I love to hear the motors sing in the middle-to-top range.
Well, I have been looking at my options and have narrowed them down to the following. I have to admit the new GG 250 4T looks interesting but I'm definitely a 2T guy.
In no specific order (all 2010 models):
Husky WR125: Really nice package but the lack of larger gas tank really sucks. This is about the only downside for me. As far as 125s go, this one is hard to beat.
Yamaha YZ125: I would set it up for woods and get 18" rear wheel. Strong aftermarket so setting it up for longer rides (big tank) would be easy. Lack of lighting coil is a downside though... along with the 19" wheel.
KTM 150XC: Still too early to tell. If it is a "fast" 125 than it would be fun... if it is a "slow" 200 than I will pass. I've read the steering stops engage too early. Not sure if you could grind them down a bit. KTM quality is nice, but I have a major issue with their philosophy on gas caps and countersprocket seals.
KTM 200XC-W: I wished that 200XC was available for 2010 but it isn't. I like the XC-spec suspension and gearing better. Along with my gas cap and countersprocket seal complaints, I'm not sure if I would be happy with this bike. The other complaint that I had with my '04 200EXc was that it was very twitchy/unstable. A steering damper was needed. No issue with power or suspension since I had it set up well.
GasGas EC200: To be honest, I never gave the little 200 much thought previously. I initially dismissed it when I bought my '04 200EXC. My view back then was why put a 200cc engine in the 250/300 chassis. Now, I think it may be a good idea. The 250/300 bikes are perfect handling-wise, so a smoother power that can scream in the upper range may be a nice fit. I would definitely want the 2K-2 ignition. It is already pre-wired for lighting and has 18" rear wheel. Plus, I love the GasGas brand.
Right now, the GasGas EC200 is winning. The Husky has me really interested, but the small gas tank sucks.
I know posting here can be slightly biased. However, I know many of you will give me honest feedback. We are a unique family here and I would be interested in hearing your thoughts. Plus, I know most of you have backgrounds with these other brands and could shed some experience on my dilema.
Almost forgot... my wife says this one needs to stay for a few years. So, I need to get it right this time.
Thanks!
As you might recall, I had a 2004 KTM 200EXC in between owning my two GasGas 250's. I feel that I'm a faster rider on the 200. Smaller bikes make you stay focused more, busy with the gear box, and carry your speed through corners. Plus, I love to hear the motors sing in the middle-to-top range.
Well, I have been looking at my options and have narrowed them down to the following. I have to admit the new GG 250 4T looks interesting but I'm definitely a 2T guy.
In no specific order (all 2010 models):
Husky WR125: Really nice package but the lack of larger gas tank really sucks. This is about the only downside for me. As far as 125s go, this one is hard to beat.
Yamaha YZ125: I would set it up for woods and get 18" rear wheel. Strong aftermarket so setting it up for longer rides (big tank) would be easy. Lack of lighting coil is a downside though... along with the 19" wheel.
KTM 150XC: Still too early to tell. If it is a "fast" 125 than it would be fun... if it is a "slow" 200 than I will pass. I've read the steering stops engage too early. Not sure if you could grind them down a bit. KTM quality is nice, but I have a major issue with their philosophy on gas caps and countersprocket seals.
KTM 200XC-W: I wished that 200XC was available for 2010 but it isn't. I like the XC-spec suspension and gearing better. Along with my gas cap and countersprocket seal complaints, I'm not sure if I would be happy with this bike. The other complaint that I had with my '04 200EXc was that it was very twitchy/unstable. A steering damper was needed. No issue with power or suspension since I had it set up well.
GasGas EC200: To be honest, I never gave the little 200 much thought previously. I initially dismissed it when I bought my '04 200EXC. My view back then was why put a 200cc engine in the 250/300 chassis. Now, I think it may be a good idea. The 250/300 bikes are perfect handling-wise, so a smoother power that can scream in the upper range may be a nice fit. I would definitely want the 2K-2 ignition. It is already pre-wired for lighting and has 18" rear wheel. Plus, I love the GasGas brand.
Right now, the GasGas EC200 is winning. The Husky has me really interested, but the small gas tank sucks.
I know posting here can be slightly biased. However, I know many of you will give me honest feedback. We are a unique family here and I would be interested in hearing your thoughts. Plus, I know most of you have backgrounds with these other brands and could shed some experience on my dilema.
Almost forgot... my wife says this one needs to stay for a few years. So, I need to get it right this time.
Thanks!